IT giants Apple and Google have entered the field of automotive intelligence. Apple has released its own in-vehicle system: CarPlay, also known as IOS device, connected to the dashboard system. Many car brands have chosen this system. Google has also launched its own in-vehicle system: Android Auto, now these two smart car systems almost occupy this market. In fact, not only intelligent in-vehicle systems, but also intelligent other types of smart devices, even smart cars can be used without drivers. It sounds like it's impossible, but Google has started to research in this area. Whether it is smart home or smart car, the key to intelligence is network technology, which means that there are tiny computers installed in smart cars. Hydraulic Clutch Bearing Hangzhou Kangxin Bearing , https://www.cnkxb.com
A similar form of operation A little surprising, but not surprising, is that Android Auto is a highly similar solution to IOS CarPlay. Just as the two systems borrow from each other on the mobile phone side, their car platforms also use a design that does not rely on separate hardware. Instead, they rely on smartphones and design interfaces only in cars to reduce costs.
Whether it is Android Auto or CarPlay, you need to use a data cable to connect to the phone (in the future, you may join the wireless connection), map the phone system to the car touch screen to achieve various functions. Both Google and Apple's in-car infotainment systems are relatively simple. Both systems do not rely on the hardware inside the car for data processing, mainly by smartphones, so they can be independently upgraded with the car for applications and functions. The two companies' respective systems also use mobile phones to gain networking capabilities, so users no longer need to purchase a dedicated online package. In general, there is almost no difference between Android Auto and CarPlay in the connection form and interface operation.
Car system without changing the car When Apple released CarPlay, it sounds like we need to buy a new car to experience this system, but fortunately, accessories manufacturers such as Pioneer have seized the opportunity and developed a car base that supports the system. seat. Google’s Android Auto’s first-time partners have already listed vendors such as Pioneer and JVC, so users who are reluctant to change cars can use their in-vehicle systems at a lower cost. This technology branch has been declining over the past few years, as most users are already content to connect their smartphones to cheap car bases and built-in audio systems via Bluetooth or even audio cables. For these manufacturers, CarPlay and Android Auto are an opportunity to make their pedestal products interesting again.
Voice and search functions CarPlay and Android Auto need to connect the phone to the car via a cable. The touch screen is an interactive medium, but voice is also the highlight of the two systems. If you want to make a phone call, play music, or get navigation, you can do it in either of the above ways. Compared to operating on a mobile phone, the car's large-size touch screen is obviously more convenient to use, but this may also cause a lot of trouble.
Both Android and IOS have powerful voice control features. Both GoogleNow and Siri have been in development for quite some time, but if you want to compete, it seems that Google is more dominant. On the one hand, Google Voice Search mainly promotes the contextual association function. Some intimate proactive services sometimes bring some small surprises. At the same time, Google Voice supports local analysis and processing, while Siri relies more on the network and the cloud, sometimes it will inevitably be due to network conditions. There is a delay problem.
However, the voice operation interface and nature of the two are slightly different. CarPlay is like using the iPhone, providing a very simple and easy to understand form; Android Auto is like Google Now on Android phones, integrating various cards, and various buttons may make beginners feel at a loss. But in terms of performance and feature coverage, Android Auto is still slightly better.
Application Advantages Apple and Google's operating systems are also very different in application integration. The attitudes of third-party applications are slightly different for the two companies. Apple clearly continues its rigorous personality. Although CarPlay supports third-party applications, developers want to move the application to the dashboard, and developers need to do extra work. Need to face a strict authentication mechanism, the application first needs to pass the IOS end certification, and then CarPlay certification to ensure good quality, but the shortcoming is undoubtedly lead to application development, review is too slow.
Google's system freedom is much greater. A number of third-party applications were announced from the beginning, including the well-known Spotify, TuneIn, etc., as well as some less well-known small vendor products. The Android Auto SDK is completely open, encourages software vendors to join, and the development environment is relatively free. It can discuss interface effects with car manufacturers, and Google will not intervene. Of course, whether the application quality and design language are unified may be a hidden danger.
Some auto and component manufacturers have announced that their systems will support both Android Auto and CarPlay, as well as in the aftermarket. At first, Apple has exclusive partners such as Audi, BMW, Volvo, but these vendors will now adopt a "cross-platform" strategy, just like the game console field, while supporting Apple and Google's in-vehicle system. Of course, they each have some exclusive brands, Apple has Ferrari and Jaguar, Google has Honda and Maserati. However, since the in-vehicle hardware can be freely replaced, the difference in the model may not be the key to the success of the two in-vehicle systems, and ultimately in terms of system experience and application support.
The future is worth looking forward to the current discussion of Android Auto or CarPlay who is better and some are too early, but it is certain that Android and IOS have begun to penetrate into every corner of life, mobile platform wars entered a new stage, the result of the final competition It is the benefit of consumers, which is the most anticipated part.
Both Apple and Google have taken a fancy to the smart car market, but now smart products require sophisticated technology and more useful features. At present, smart products on the market do not seem to meet the actual needs of ordinary users, so the entire smart product market can only wait, the timing is not yet mature.